Southwest Pilots' Union Seeks Sanctions Against Reporting Officer
The Southwest Airlines Pilots Association (SWAPA) has requested court sanctions against a first officer who reported a captain's indecent exposure in 2020. This action marks a new phase in a four-year legal dispute.

Union Seeks Penalties Against First Officer
The Southwest Airlines Pilots Association (SWAPA) has formally requested court sanctions against a first officer who reported a senior captain for indecent exposure during a 2020 flight. This development emerges four years into the first officer’s lawsuit, which alleges both the airline and the union retaliated against her for her report.
SWAPA's motion specifically asks the court to order First Officer Christine Janning and her legal counsel to cover the union’s legal expenses. Initially, SWAPA attempted to keep this motion confidential, but the Orange County, Florida clerk denied the request for sealed proceedings.
This legal manoeuvre intensifies a dispute that began with a federal crime and broadened into claims of professional reprisal within the aviation sector.
2020 Cockpit Incident and Guilty Plea
The incident occurred on 10 August 2020, aboard Southwest flight 6607 from Philadelphia to Orlando. First Officer Janning was operating the Boeing 737 alongside Captain Michael Haak, a senior pilot approaching retirement. According to Janning’s account, Haak, whom she had not previously met, locked the cockpit door at cruising altitude.
He then disrobed, watched pornography on a laptop, and engaged in what the Justice Department later described as "inappropriate conduct" while Janning maintained control of the aircraft. Haak subsequently pleaded guilty to committing a lewd, indecent, or obscene act.
He received one year of probation and a $5,000 fine, as detailed in Department of Transportation inspector general reports and his sentencing submission. Janning’s original September 2022 complaint further alleges Haak exposed himself for over 30 minutes, photographed himself, and encouraged her participation.
She states she photographed him to gather evidence while continuing her duties. Later complaints added claims he blocked her exit, became angered by her refusal to watch the pornography, and threatened to crash the aircraft if she resisted.
Allegations of Airline Retaliation
Following the incident, First Officer Janning reported the events to Southwest Airlines employee relations. She asserts the airline informed her six days later that no internal investigation would occur, citing Captain Haak’s retirement. Janning met with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in December 2020.
A week later, Southwest removed her from flying duties while she was in Denver. She received a letter from the chief pilot, stating her removal fell under Section 2.C of the pilot contract, intended to facilitate her participation in the FBI investigation.
Janning contends this clause, which covers possible offences or fitness-for-duty issues, was used to suggest she might be under investigation or psychologically unfit. This letter, she claims, circulated to over 25 Southwest and SWAPA employees and included her home address.
Janning remained grounded for approximately 105 days, leading to a loss of flight currency and recurrent training. She also alleges underpayment of nearly $30,000. Upon her return to flying in March 2021, Janning claims managers and other pilots spread rumours, portraying her as mentally unstable, a dangerous pilot, promiscuous, and previously involved with Haak.
Union’s Alleged Role and Prior Complaints
First Officer Janning further alleges that SWAPA declined to challenge her grounding, lost pay, or treatment by Southwest. Conversely, when Captain Haak appeared for sentencing, SWAPA Vice President Mike Santoro submitted a letter to the federal judge on Haak’s behalf.
Santoro described Haak as having a "spotless employment and training record" and no prior employment-related complaints requiring union representation. Janning’s Fourth Amended Complaint asserts that SWAPA knew Haak’s record was not spotless.
It claims four crew members reported Haak to SWAPA Professional Standards in 2008 for sexual harassment, sexual assault, and indecent exposure. SWAPA allegedly interviewed three flight attendants and a first officer regarding these complaints.
Senior union officials were reportedly briefed, and the union assisted in arranging Haak's attendance at a behavioural programme in Montreal. Janning contends that neither Southwest nor SWAPA disclosed these prior reports during the federal investigation into the 2020 incident.
She also alleges that Southwest initially instructed employees not to cooperate with the FBI until investigators intervened. Furthermore, Janning claims management and union officials collectively agreed to ground her and discredit her professional standing.
Implications for Aviation Industry
SWAPA's motion for sanctions against First Officer Janning introduces a new dimension to this protracted legal battle. If the court grants SWAPA's request, Janning could face significant financial penalties, potentially covering the union's legal expenses incurred during the lawsuit.
This development will likely influence the ongoing litigation, particularly regarding the claims of retaliation and alleged concealment of past conduct. The court’s decision on this motion will be a key indicator of the lawsuit's future direction, impacting both Janning’s pursuit of justice and the union's defence against the retaliation allegations.
The outcome could establish precedents for how airlines and pilot unions manage misconduct reports and protect reporting employees.
Get The Post.
The global travel stories that matter, three mornings a week. Free.


